即刻App年轻人的同好社区
下载
App内打开
bourbaki菌
3k关注627被关注0夸夸
以为自己懂点历史,
以为自己懂点数学;
很多不明白,犯错如吃🍚;
但日拱一卒,很开心🥳
置顶
bourbaki菌
2年前
这句话应该用最好的纸打印出来,裱起来。

特别是我们自2020年以来一直“见证”历史
95
bourbaki菌
8天前
知名launcher app Raycast(Alfred竞品)
最近出了浏览器插件(目前仅支持chrome,safari待出)
如果真的能够做到自动化处理,
那这个AI小费还是不得不交

如果只是总结视频那大可不必。

www.raycast.com
10
bourbaki菌
12天前
月底应该不会续费ChatGPT了
可能会试试claude pro
但担心被封号,瑟瑟发抖

考虑试一下付费supermaven、cursor
(Github Copilot竞品)
以及julius.ai
(AI加持的数据分析系统,
支持GPT-4与Claude 3 Opus模型等)
30
bourbaki菌
13天前
现在chrome浏览器不仅仅有了

live caption还有了live translation

速度肯定相较live translation慢点
00
bourbaki菌
13天前
𝕏目前未知远超其他平台适合最终AI热点。

我看来至少有四点别的平台很难触及

1. lists可以将某个领域的专家一网打尽

2. 个人觉得相关帖子推荐很准确(我不是付费用户)

3. 相关的AI专家/工程师都有账号
(特别是年轻研究员论文需要PR)
这次AI浪潮也出现了很多原本没看到的

4. Community notes。印象深刻的就是
一个车臣的研究人员说Claude 3 Opus
在给了例子的情况下就能够非常准确翻译车臣语,
他认为GPT-4也不能做到。
后来他发帖更正Claude在训练集中就有车臣语。
(community notes也在他帖子上注明)
国内的转发就做不到这样的及时性。
00
bourbaki菌
13天前
(续上篇)
我问两位教授对战情况,
模型反应的情况如图。
事实上,辩论过程中能感受到tense
音量也拉了老高的。
00
bourbaki菌
13天前
用Gemini Pro 1.5 总结Lex Fridman最新的debate
(切割字幕文件放到Claude上有点悬)

听过这次播客的,有兴趣可以挑挑刺:
(google的aistudio是可以
调整安全等级的,请见图(二))

照抄一下:
Summary of the Debate on Israel and Palestine:
Main Topic: The events of 1948 and their significance for the ongoing conflict.
Participants:
Norman Finkelstein: Historian, critical of Israeli policies and actions.
Benny Morris: Historian, known for his research on the Palestinian refugee issue.
Mueen Rabbani: Middle East analyst, critical of Israeli policies and actions.
Steven Benell (Destiny): Political commentator and streamer, supportive of Israel.
Key Points:
1948:
Finkelstein & Rabbani:
The 1948 war resulted in the displacement of 700,000 Palestinians (Nakba).
They argue that "transfer" or expulsion of Arabs was inherent in Zionist ideology, citing quotes and writings from early Zionist leaders like Herzl and Ben-Gurion.
They believe the partition plan was unjust and favored the Jewish community, leading to the Nakba.
They emphasize the role of the British in sponsoring Zionism and contributing to the conflict.
Morris & Benell:
The partition plan was a just solution proposed by the international community.
They argue that the Arabs rejected the partition plan and initiated the war, leading to the refugee problem.
They acknowledge the presence of the idea of "transfer" in early Zionist thought but argue it was never official policy and only became relevant in the context of the war.
They emphasize Arab hostility and rejectionism as the primary cause of the conflict.
Modern Day:
Finkelstein & Rabbani:
They are critical of Israel's actions in Gaza and the West Bank, describing them as "genocidal" and "apartheid."
They believe that international law and UN resolutions should be the basis for resolving the conflict.
They express pessimism about the possibility of peace without dismantling the "Zionist regime."
Morris & Benell:
They defend Israel's actions as necessary for self-defense and counter-terrorism.
They are critical of Hamas and its ideology, which they consider genocidal.
They believe that a two-state solution is still feasible and that direct bilateral negotiations are the only way to achieve peace.
They criticize the use of "hyperbolic language" and the focus on international law, arguing that it hinders realistic negotiations.
Hope for the Future:
Finkelstein & Rabbani:
They find hope in the resilience of the Palestinian people and their continued resistance.
They believe that international pressure and internal dissent within Israel might eventually lead to a just solution.
Morris & Benell:
They believe that hope lies in the emergence of a pragmatic Palestinian leadership willing to accept Israel and engage in good faith negotiations.
They emphasize the need for Palestinians to abandon violence and embrace diplomacy.
Overall:
The debate highlights the starkly different perspectives on the history and present of the conflict, with each side blaming the other for the ongoing violence and suffering. While there is some agreement on historical facts, the interpretations and moral judgments diverge significantly. Both sides express pessimism about the current situation but offer different paths towards a possible future peace.
00
bourbaki菌
13天前
看到凡是都抢先一步内测的沃顿
商学院教授又拿到Devin测试了
他测试下来还是很满意的
至少很乐观,认为的确是条新思路。

评论区BabyAGI的作者Yohei @yoheinakajima
评论道:任务应该于聊天同步进行。

大即上有人拿到了吗,好奇效果如何
(费不费token,需不需要钞能力)

ps:翻译用的就是沉浸式插件,
Groq api,llama70B模型,
相较头部几个比还是容易出问题
截图那个就是第一大块没翻译出来
遇到"符号,英->中就会有这样的问题。
00
bourbaki菌
14天前
前有LPU,又见KPU(Knowledge Processing Unit)
前面是拼速度,这个是拼IQ

真热闹,只是有waitlist(页面也是好看的)

maisa.ai
00
bourbaki菌
14天前
沉浸式翻译插件换成了Groq真的快啊,
体验就是不一样啊。
Prompt有需要优化,
让他只返回翻译,但是还是会有多余的内容。

AI的产品要么就是天下武功唯快不破
要么就是底层模型非常强大。
02
bourbaki菌
14天前
本周最令人深思的一篇推文大意是这样:

一位神经科学家截图了杨立昆推文对话,
指出研究意识问题的专家尚未发表统一见解,
而一这人却轻率地断言AI(尤其是LLM)没有意识。
(推文内容至此)

自2022年地ChatGPT公开亮相以来,
虽然这可能意味着一些人
不得不改变职业;与此同时,
新的工作形式和商业模式也将应运而生。

无论是人文、自然还是工程领域的科学家,
都能从各自的视角探索AI的奥秘
(正如当初AI的发展历程一样)。
我们的确处在一个激动人心的时代。
11