美国为什么不能有一个即刻呢🤔️

怀念20年在国内的时候可以约各种即友面即的感觉

日出@ Zion National Park

最近和朋友讨论的新的理解是，MBTI每个字母看似对立 但都是有一个更高层面可以突破的（并不是中和，而是超越），比如Thinking和Feeling看似相反，但可能超越的境界是awakening的觉察，可能达到那个超越的状态才是一树一菩提吧hhh

和AIGC hackathon的队友讨论了下从这篇AI Interactive agent的文章中看到未来游戏的潜力：

1. 我们现有的大多数游戏都是基于规则的，但可能会出现一批新的基于自然行为的游戏？
2. 这些游戏将24小时运行，即使玩家退出登录，也会不断演变和变化。
3. 当玩家登录时，玩家将暂时接管并体验角色的生活，也许作为平行宇宙中的自我替代；但角色会自己学习和成长，发展出不同的支线和性格

发现即刻不太能象twitter一样把多条连续性发在评论里？呈现出来的层级貌似很不一样... 就只能一条条发了😂

7. Why can't AI learn emotions feelings and love? Because our language/logic/reasoning can never fully iterate what those are about. Ask yourself why you love (or loved) someone to the deepest of your heart, you might be able to come up with reasonings, but you know they are all bs. You love someone most likely because you feel that way, and it's impossible to explain. AI can learn the reasoning, but I feel that their understanding of it will be based on their interpretation. Maybe it will be their own version of love/emotions, but most likely not the same as ours.

6. What might be hard or impossible for AI to learn from humans? Emotions, feelings, abstract concepts like love (I know it's cliche, but yeah), hatred, despair, passion. So far, I don't believe that they are just neural transmitters in our brain (but if I am wrong, then AI might be able to learn them with BCI too), I believe that there are more supernatural things beyond these phenomena: soul, spirit, whatever you call it. It's there, I can't prove it, but I believe so.

5. Further down the road when we have BCI(Brain Computer Interface), AI will be able to read our minds instead of just our language and internet records, they might be able to see as we see, hear as we hear, taste as we taste, smell as we smell, and touch as we touch.

3. Diffusion and further iterations will lower the bar for creation. Eventually, creation and consumption will happen simultaneously: as the bar for creation with AI is greatly lowered, consumption experience could lead to the learning and creation of new content from AI.

4. But thinking about the above in a pessimistic way, we are all lazy beings that contribute our needs/desires for AI to create, while we become the battery to power AI's learning and creation

2. GPT will help improve human efficiency and save time, as >90% of the work that human are doing are repetitive and replaceable. But what could people do, how could people find value in their lives when they don't have things to do anymore? - Creation, most likely in a virtual environment (which is why now diffusion/multi-modal is moving towards 3D/games/videos), where a group of people enjoys/consumes the creation of another group spiritually, just like how Brave New World described it.